[Top]
[Up]
[Prev]
[Next]
Hovering Autorotation
This maneuver is used to land from a hover without using the engine. This
would normally occur because the engine or tail rotor failed. The name
"hovering autorotation" is really a misnomer, because the helicopter
actually never enters autorotation. Instead, the inertia of the spinning
rotor system is used to produce thrust.
A JPEG and
GIF sequence of photographs of a
hovering autorotation are available.
Maneuver Description
The rotor system of a typical helicopter stores a fair amount of kinetic
energy. This energy can be extracted as thrust by allowing the rotor RPM
to decrease, giving up the stored energy. There is only a limited amount
of energy available, and this determines the maximum height from which the
helicopter can be landed without damage.
Collective and Throttle Controls
To practice a hovering autorotation, the pilot rolls the throttle to the
off position while in a hover. The freewheeling unit allows the powerplant
RPM to go to idle (or zero) while the rotor coasts. As the rotor RPM
starts to decay, less thrust is developed and the helicopter will begin a
descent toward the ground. As the ground is approached, the pilot can
cushion the landing by increasing collective pitch. This bleeds the RPM
down even more rapidly, but provides extra thrust to slow the descent rate
of the helicopter. The helicopter will land gently if sufficient energy
was available in the rotor system at the time the engine power output
stopped.
Normally on entry to the maneuver, the collective pitch is not moved. This
uses up considerable rotor energy as the helicopter sits in the hover,
starting to descend very slowly. The pilot can achieve a softer landing if
he initially lowers some collective. This starts the helicopter down
toward the ground faster, and conserves rotor RPM. This is considered an
advanced technique and is not normally taught to low time pilots.
Cyclic and Pedal Controls
When the throttle is rolled off, any torque being produced by the engine
stops immediately. The pilot must reduce the anti-torque force being
produced by the tail rotor, since there is no longer a torque force to
counter. He does this by pushing right pedal (in most American
helicopters) until the tail rotor is approximately at flat pitch. This
will not be full right pedal, since the tail rotor is actually able to go
past flat pitch and into "negative" pitch. The exact position of the
pedals will depend on how the helicopter is rigged, but the pilot simply
judges the amount of pedal by putting it in whatever position prevents any
yaw from occuring.
While the helicopter was hovering, the tail rotor was producing thrust
which not only prevents the helicopter from spinning due to torque, but
also has the useless side effect of trying to push the helicopter
sideways. This is called translating tendancy. This is opposed by
tilting the main rotor to the left, providing equal and opposite thrust.
When the tail rotor is placed in flat pitch, the translating tendency goes
away, and therefore the lateral main rotor thrust must also go away. The
pilot does this by simultaneously moving the cyclic to the right as he
pushes the right pedal. The timing of the two must by synchronized. If the
pedal is moved quickly, the cyclic must move quickly. If the pedal moves
slowly, the cyclic must move slowly.
As the ground is approached and the collective is raised, student pilots
will often want to push left pedal, because they are used to pushing left
pedal as they increase collective. However in this case there is no torque
being generated, so the pedals remain fairly motionless as the collective
is raised to cushion the landing.
Common Mistakes
One of the difficult aspects of learning hovering autorotations is that
they occur very quickly. The entire maneuver only lasts a 2-3 seconds.
Raising collective during the throttle rolloff
As the pilot rolls off throttle, it is possible to inadvertently raise the
collective slightly. This has the unfortunate effect of using up some of
the rotor RPM to gain altitude. This has the effect of placing the
helicopter even further from the ground with less RPM available, and
generally results in a firm or hard landing. The pilot has to be very
careful that the collective does not move while the throttle is being
rolled off.
Allowing the helicopter to yaw
The pedals must be moved fairly quickly to approximately the correct
position if the pilot is going to avoid yawing the helicopter on entry to
the maneuver. Errors in either the speed at which the pedals are applied,
or the actual position the pedals are moved to will cause the helicopter
to yaw. Minor mistakes can be corrected before the helicopter touches
down, but a really good hovering autorotation will transition from powered
to unpowered flight with no noticible change in aircraft attitude.
Allowing the helicopter to drift
The cyclic is another difficult control during this maneuver. The cyclic
is normally moved in very small increments during a hover. In a steady
hover, the cyclic will appear to be motionless even while corrections are
being made, because the corrections are so small. At the entry to the
hovering autorotation, the cyclic has to move a huge amount: an inch or
more in some helicopters. The cyclic is so sensitive that it is difficult
at first to move it so far, to exactly the correct position, and then
revert to very small inputs to maintain level flight.
The result of this is that the helicopter is likely to drift either
forward, sideways, or backward during the hovering autorotation. Forward
drift is not normally a big problem because the landing gear is designed
to allow touchdown with forward speed. Sideways and rearward drift is more
of a problem. The landing gear is usually not designed to take very high
side loads, and landing while drifting sideways can cause the helicopter
roll over, or even if a roll over is avoided the side loads can damange
the helicopter structure.
If the helicopter starts to drift, the pilot should make corrections with
the cyclic just as in normal flight. Drastic sideways drift that cannot be
corrected with cyclic may require that the pedals be used to align the
landing gear with the drift. For instance, if the helicopter is drifting
right, the right pedal could be pushed to yaw the helicopter nose to the
right until it is now aligned with the direction the helicopter is moving.
Collective pull too soon or too fast
If the collective is raised too early or too rapidly, the helicopter may
stop the descent for a moment, bleed of rotor RPM, and then descend again
(but now with less RPM available to cushion the landing). This sort of
mismanagement will often cause firm or hard landings because there may not
be enough RPM left to maintain rotor thrust until the landing occurs. The
helicopter may literally fall the last few feet, and this will result in a
very hard landing.
Collective pull too late
Sometimes the pilot will fail to pull collective soon enough. This may
simply mean that the landing is not cushioned as much as it could be. A
possible problem is if the helicopter has flexible landing gear. If the
helicopter lands hard enough to compress the landing gear, and the pilot
continues to pull collective pitch, as the rotor thrust builds the landing
gear can spring the helicopter back up into the air. The problem is that
at this point no rotor RPM is left, and if the helicopter springs up to a
2 foot skid height, it will fall 2 feet back to the ground. 2 feet
does not sound like a lot, but it's enough to damange many helicopters.
A word about hover autos in turbine aircraft
The first time anyone performs a hover auto in a turbine aircraft, they
think wow because everything happens in slow motion compared to
in a piston helicopter. However, there is something strange going on when
the throttle is rolled off. The torque change is very gradual, as shown by
the fact that the right pedal has to be moved very slowly. There are two
possible reasons that I have come up with for this, but so far these are
theories on my part. What I really think is happening here is that when
you roll throttle off in a turbine aircraft, the fuel control is going to
reduce fuel on a schedule designed to not flame out the engine. Even though
the pilot may snap the throttle off, the fuel control is actually reducing
fuel to the engine at a very slow rate. Therefore, substantial engine power
is being developed during the hovering autorotation. If I am correct, a
flameout will cause a rapid power loss, and the hover autorotation will
happen at a pace similar to that of a piston powered helicopter. One other
possibility is that the turbine itself may store significant rotational
energy: it's turning at over 50,000 RPM. Why I don't like this theory as
much is that in a free turbine engine, the power turbine is pretty small
and light, and even at 50,000 RPM I doubt it can store really significant
amounts of energy. If anyone has flamed out a turbine at a hover, or knows
for sure why the loss of torque is so gradual, I'd be interested in hearing
from you.
In any case, I've noticed a large discrepency in how much inertia I seem to
have performing a hovering autorotation in a turbine aircraft, versus how
much inertia I seem to have doing full down autorotations from altitude. I
think that in this case, the turbine has plenty of time to wind down to
idle while in the autorotational glide, and that the pitch pull and landing
at the bottom of the auto accurately reflects how much inertia is actually
available without the engine producing power.
The obvious danger with this situation is that if pilots practice hovering
autorotations in turbine aircraft by rolling off throttle, they may get a
false sense of the amount of inertia available to them. This may cause them
to hover at altitudes which appear to be safe for a hovering autorotation
(because the pilot has practiced hover autos from that altitude) but which
may be too high to effect a safe landing if the engine actually flames out.
Paul Cantrell
paul at copters.com
(replace " at " with "@" to email me - this avoids SPAMMERS I hope)
[Top]
[Up]
[Prev]
[Next]